At a recent visit to our State Fair, I popped into the booth of our local news channel and quickly became entranced by a big chair in the back of the room. I had to sit on it.
Why? It was from The Voice, one of my favorite TV shows. Each season, aspiring singers have a chance to get mentored by world-famous music icons.
But it all starts with the blind auditions. The celebrity musicians sit in their chairs, back turned to the hopeful singer. They don’t have a clue what this person looks like or how they perform.
All they can focus on is the performer’s voice. But over the years, I’ve learned how nuanced that is. They hear things I’ve never noticed like tone, timing, transitions, weak spots, strengths, song choice, and so much more.
If a judge likes someone, he/she pushes the big button on the chair, which then turns them around to see who they’ve chosen. The singer now gets a chance to be on the show. If multiple celebs turn, he/she gets to choose who to work with.
Which got me thinking …. What if, instead of holding presidential debates like we do today, there might be a better way.
Right now, most of us approach elections, voting and candidates from the perspective of the team or person we already identify with. That’s natural.
But imagine really focusing first on our criteria—what really matters to us and in what priority. Then listening to the candidates with open ears.
If we do this ahead of time, as we listen, we can be asking questions like:
For me, the big question is: “Can this person create positive change in a polarized world?”
The reality is, we can either fight over things … or work together to create a better future.
My two cents.
P.S. Here’s a link to some of the blind auditions from last season.
youtube.com